🔗 Share this article

Many people feel this way. Online services are declining, at an alarming pace. The platforms we rely on, that used to satisfy us? They're all transforming into subpar offerings, simultaneously. Think about platform users who must scroll through multiple screens of attention-seeking content, AI-generated content and personalized marketing only to find actual content from friends. This experience feels infuriating. Annoying. And, depending on how essential these platforms remain in your life, it becomes terrifying.

Understanding the Pattern

In recent years, a distinct phrase has become popular to characterize the quick degradation impacting online services: platform decay. This vocabulary has gained significant recognition. It represents not merely a narrative about deterioration. It provides an analytical framework that reveals why digital platforms decline, the progression of this decline, and the spreading effect that's making all services to worsen simultaneously.

This current era we're living through, this Great Enshittening, represents a tangible occurrence, similar to a disease, featuring identifiable signs, a particular process and spreading characteristics. When healthcare experts examine affected people affected by a new pathogen, their primary focus involves documenting the progression timeline of the illness. This detailed account presents a structured inventory of the disease's advancement: which indicators emerge, and following what pattern?

The Progressive Steps

This outlines the progression of service decline:

1. First, services handle their audience respectfully.
2. Then, they start mistreating their audience to benefit their business customers.
3. In the end, they begin exploiting those business customers to reclaim all the advantages for their corporate interests – and turn into a massive disappointment.

This cycle emerges universally. After you learn this mechanism, you'll begin seeing it repeatedly. Consider Amazon, a company that began by allowing book delivery to your home and ultimately emerged as the dominant player for various goods, even as reducing tax obligations and filling its marketplace with substandard merchandise and other junk.

Stage 1: Beneficial to Users

Amazon started with significant capital that it could allocate for its users. The company raised substantial capital from initial backers, then more money through stock market listing. Then, it employed this capital to subsidize various goods, selling them below cost. Furthermore, it underwrote delivery expenses and implemented an accommodating refund process without complicated procedures.

This appealing arrangement attracted countless shoppers to register the service. After they joined, the premium service effectively locked them in. Pre-paying delivery costs for a full year generates strong incentive to conduct shopping on Amazon's platform. Indeed, the vast majority of premium members begin their online shopping queries through Amazon and, when they find the goods they need, typically don't comparison shop for better deals.

You can conceptualize the premium service as a type of soft retention, Amazon binding you to its service with subtle ties. Yet Amazon also employs more rigid constraints in its methodology. Every audio title and films, and nearly all electronic publications and digital magazines you purchase from Amazon stay forever linked to its system.

They are provided with copy protection, a form of encryption created to require you to access content using programs that Amazon controls. If you terminate your Amazon relationship and remove your applications, you will forfeit all the materials you acquired over time from the service. For particular kinds of consumers, audience members or film fans, this constitutes a considerable obstacle to leaving.

Amazon utilizes another tactic: following extended periods of offering items below market price, it has finished the work that big box stores initially started, removing substantial numbers of small, independent physical businesses. Its internet loss-leading strategy has produced comparable outcomes across much of the digital marketplace sector.

This situation implies that purchasing from any source other than Amazon has become significantly more inconvenient. These approaches – Prime membership, DRM protection and loss-leading – make it extremely difficult to refrain from purchasing at Amazon. With shoppers effectively captured, to continue with the decline pattern, Amazon needed to secure its commercial sellers similarly committed.

Phase 2: User Exploitation, Business Advantages

Amazon was at first extremely advantageous to those business customers. It paid full price for their merchandise, then sold them below cost to its users. It also subsidized product returns and customer service. It operated a fair product finder, which showed the most relevant results for shoppers' queries in prominent locations, establishing pathways for merchants to succeed merely by providing reliable goods at fair costs.

Then, once those merchants were effectively trapped, Amazon tightened control. Amazon openly discusses this technique, which it terms "the flywheel". It brings in shoppers with low prices and comprehensive inventory. This appeals to merchants who are eager to access those customers. The sellers' reliance on those customers permits Amazon to extract better terms from those sellers, and that draws additional customers, which turns the marketplace progressively vital for sellers, enabling the company to require even deeper discounts – and the cycle continues.

Let's examine this phenomenon more widely. This process illustrates the direct result of an extreme judicial concept that has controlled global thinking since the end of the 1970s. Starting in the 1890s until the Jimmy Carter administration, Corporate dominance in America was restricted by competition regulation, which viewed {